Triton PCS Holdings Inc
In their words
“The company reported churn of 2.12%, its lowest level since the second quarter of 2002”
NPS disclosures (0)
No NPS disclosures yet.
Retention disclosures (19)
Churn: 2.8% (FY2004) — “Subscriber churn was 2.8% and 2.3% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.”
Churn: 2.3% (Q1 2004 (three months ended March 31, 2004)) — “Subscriber churn was 2.3% and 2.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.”
Churn: 2.31% (FY2003) — “Subscriber churn was 2.31% and 2.16% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.”
Churn: 2.31% (FY2003) — “Subscriber churn was 2.31% and 2.16% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.”
Churn: 2.22% (9M 2003) — “Subscriber churn was 2.22% and 2.05% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.”
Churn: 2.46% (Q3 2003) — “Subscriber churn was 2.46% and 2.24% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.”
Churn: 2.46% (Q3 2003) — “Churn in the quarter was 2.46% compared with 2.24% during the third quarter 2002.”
Churn: 2.07% (Q2 2003) — “Churn Drops to 2.07%; ARPU Rises to $56.51”
Churn: 2.1% (Q1 2003) — “Subscriber churn was 2.1% and 1.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.”
Churn: 2.12% (Q1 2003) — “The company reported churn of 2.12%, its lowest level since the second quarter of 2002”
Churn: 2.16% (FY2002) — “Subscriber churn was 2.16% and 1.95% for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.”
Churn: 2.1% (9M 2002) — “Subscriber churn was 2.1% and 1.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.”
Churn: 2.2% (Q3 2002) — “Subscriber churn was 2.2% and 2.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.”
Churn: 2% (three months ended June 30, 2002) — “Subscriber churn was 2.0% and 1.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively”
Churn: 1.88% (three months ended March 31, 2002) — “Subscriber churn was 1.88% and 1.93% for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.”
Churn: 1.95% (FY2001) — “Subscriber churn was 1.95% and 1.80% for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.”
Churn: 1.93% (9M 2001 (nine months ended September 30, 2001)) — “Churn...was 1.93% and 1.81% for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively”
Churn: 1.95% (Q3 2001 (three months ended September 30, 2001)) — “Subscriber attrition, or churn, was 1.95% and 1.92% for the three months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000”
Churn: 1.9% (Q1 2001) — “Subscriber attrition, or "churn", was 1.9% and 1.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively”
Lighthouse companies in Telecom & media
About these figures
Every figure here was publicly disclosed by the named company: press releases, annual reports, SEC filings, earnings calls and news coverage. Companies tend to publish their NPS when it is good, so these numbers run higher than a true industry average: read them as what leading companies in this vertical say publicly, not as an industry benchmark.
NPS runs from −100 to +100. Retention figures are reported as the company defines them (net revenue retention, gross revenue retention, customer retention rate, churn). Every entry links to its source in the full database.